The impact of prolapse to canal ratio (PCR) in cauda equina syndrome outcomes and operative management

Published research co-authored by Mr Gordan Grahovac

This paper considered whether the size of a disc prolapse relative to the spinal canal was linked with cauda equina syndrome outcomes. It is relevant because imaging measures may help clinicians understand severity and plan treatment, but they do not replace clinical assessment.


Research snapshot

Article title: The impact of prolapse to canal ratio (PCR) in cauda equina syndrome outcomes and operative management

Authors: Asfand Baig Mirza, Feras Fayez, Sami Rashed, Ammal Bibi Shahid, Chaitanya Sharma, Rishabh Suvarna, et al., Gordan Grahovac, Babak Arvin, Ahmed-Ramadan Sadek

Publication type: Journal article

Publication date: 2 April 2025

Publication details: European Spine Journal. 2025.

PMID: 40172650

PMCID:

DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08816-x

Study type: Retrospective cohort study

Mr Grahovac’s involvement: Listed author on the publication

Original publication: View the original publication on PubMed


What this paper looked at

This study focused on cauda equina syndrome caused by herniated lumbar discs. It evaluated prolapse to canal ratio, a radiological measure comparing disc prolapse size with the spinal canal, and considered its relationship with long-term outcomes and operative management.

Key points from the publication

The abstract describes a five-year retrospective cohort across two neurosurgical centres. Adult patients with cauda equina syndrome due to herniated lumbar discs were included, and treatment involved laminectomy and/or discectomy. Detailed full results should be checked in the publication before quoting further statistics.

Clinical relevance

The work is relevant to imaging interpretation, surgical planning and risk discussion in cauda equina syndrome. It may help clinicians consider how radiological compression relates to presentation and outcome.

What this means in context

Cauda equina syndrome remains a clinical and imaging diagnosis, and one measurement cannot determine treatment by itself. Decisions depend on symptoms, bladder and bowel function, neurological findings, MRI features, timing and specialist review.

View the original publication

You can view the original peer-reviewed publication through PubMed or via the article DOI.

View the original publication on PubMed

About Mr Gordan Grahovac

Mr Gordan Grahovac is a Consultant Neurosurgeon and Complex Spinal Surgeon with expertise in managing complex spinal and neurosurgical conditions.

His work includes the assessment and treatment of patients with degenerative spinal conditions, spinal cord compression, spinal tumours, complex spinal pathology and conditions requiring specialist neurosurgical input.

His approach focuses on careful diagnosis, appropriate treatment planning and helping patients understand their options clearly.

Learn more about Mr Grahovac

Important note

This page is for educational purposes only and should not be taken as individual medical advice.

If you or someone you know has symptoms such as worsening headache, confusion, drowsiness, weakness, changes in speech, seizures, balance problems or symptoms following a head injury, seek urgent medical advice.

Previous
Previous

Surgical outcomes of unilateral painful foot drop secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter retrospective study

Next
Next

Lumbar Drain Infection Rates: A Comprehensive Risk Factor Analysis From a Multicenter Retrospective Study of 1000+ Cases